Why PDEng Sucks, Part 3

From this term’s PDEng 225 final cumulative assignment marking rubric, under the description for a ‘strong’ response:

Explanations include more than one pieces of evidence to support perspectives

I’d have to give that explanation a grade of ‘weak/incomplete’, but then again, it’s never been the PDEng custom to reward good writing.

Technorati Tags: , ,

One Response to “Why PDEng Sucks, Part 3”

  1. fuckpdeng Says:

    5 years after all my interviewer will ask me ” so you looks like a bright guy, tell me what else did u learn and do during u coop term(hint: we want someone with variaty of characteristic),” and i would just out of the chair with my ass flying high and ‘proudly said’ :” during my work term, i worked, ate , sleep , and guess what, i also did PDENG!, so i’m i hired?’ (shouting)”What de fuck is pdeng?”

Leave a Reply


Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/usr/bin/convert) is not within the allowed path(s): (./:/scripts/php/:/home/:/tmp/:/usr/share/pear/) in /home/white-raven/domains/blog.white-raven.net/public_html/wp-content/plugins/secureimage.php on line 267
Couldn't find your convert utility at /usr/bin/convert. Check that you have ImageMagick installed.